A
second convention of deputies from the towns of the Province, met at
Exeter in January, 1775, to consider the state of affairs and choose
delegates to attend the next General Congress to be held at Philadelphia
on the 10th of May following. Major Sullivan and Capt. Langdon were chosen
for this purpose.
There
is no record of the sending of a deputy or delegate by this town to the
above mentioned convention, but it appears that its proceedings were
heartily indorsed by a majority of the inhabitants.
Under
date of Jan. 17, 1775, is the record of a town-meeting, at which it was
voted to accept of the result of the General Congress held at Philadelphia
in the autumn of the preceding year; to act upon a letter that came from
the chairman of the Provincial Committee; also, that this town would pay
its proportion of the cost of another Congress to be held at Philadelphia
the following May. Lieut. Brown, Lieut. Hinds, Nathaniel Bingham, Silas
Thompson and Ephraim Baldwin were constituted a committee “to draw up
articles" and make return of the proceedings of the meeting to the
Provincial Committee.
The
annual town-meeting was held on the first day of March. In the warrant for
the same was the following article. "To see if the town will choose a
committee, agreeable to the advice of the Continental Congress, whose
business it shall be attentively to observe the conduct of all persons
touching said Congress." In accordance with this advice, Ensign Moses
Smith, Dea. Silas Thompson and Lieut. Jacob Hinds were chosen "to
observe the conduct of all persons," as above stated.
Society,
at the time the war began, was in a very unhappy condition, being, in
fact, in a state bordering upon anarchy. Dr. Jeremy Belknap, who wrote his
excellent "History of New Hampshire" before the close of the
last century, and who personally experienced the excitement and hardships
of the Revolution, gives us the following vivid picture of the state of
society in 1775:
"A
spirit of violent resentment was excited against all who were suspected of
a disposition inimical to the American Cause. Some persons were taken up
on suspicion and imprisoned; some fled to Nova Scotia or to England, or
joined the British army in Boston. Others were restricted to certain
limits and their motions continually watched. The passions of jealousy,
hatred and revenge were freely indulged, and the tongue of slander was
under no restraint. Wise and good men secretly lamented these excesses;
but no effectual remedy could be
administered. All commissions under the former authority being
annulled, the courts of justice were shut, and the sword of magistracy was
sheathed. The Provincial Convention directed the general affairs of the
war; and town commit- tees had a discretionary, but undefined, power to
preserve domestic peace."
Nathaniel
Bingham, Ephraim Hubbard, Stephen Carter, Moses Smith, Jr., and John
Davison were the selectmen this year (1775), having been chosen at the
annual meeting.
In
May, the royal Governor, John Wentworth, called a new Assembly, and urged
the members to adopt measures that would restore tranquillity. A new
Convention of deputies was in session at Exeter at the same time, and gave
the Assembly instructions with regard to the course to be pursued bv the
latter. In
accordance with these instructions, the Assembly ejected three members
whom the Governor had summoned, by the King's writ, from three new
townships.
This
so displeased Gov. Wentworth that he adjourned the Assembly to the
eleventh day of July following. One of the expelled members having in some
way incurred the displeasure of the populace, took refuge in the
Governor's house. The people placed a gun, mounted upon a carriage, before
the door, and the man was surrendered. The Governor then withdrew to the
fort, and his house, which was in Portsmouth, was pillaged. The Assembly
having met on the 11th of July, according to adjournment, Gov. Wentworth
sent a message from the fort and adjourned it to Sept. 28th; but it never
met again. However, when the time came for the meeting of the Assembly,
the Governor issued a proclamation from the Isles, of Shoals, adjourning
it to the next April. This was his last official act, as Governor of the
Province, and British rule in New Hampshire was now virtually ended.
The
Convention that met at Exeter in May, was in session most of the time till
November. One hundred and two towns were represented by 133 members.
Post-offices were established, and a committee of supplies for the army
and a "committee of safety" were formed. The Convention also
proceeded to get possession of the provincial records.
Before
the Convention dissolved, it applied to the General Congress for advice
with regard to the form of government to be adopted. The General Congress
recommended that a full and free representation of the people should be
called, to adopt such a form of government as should he thought best for
the Province during the contest with Great Britain. Accordingly, the.
Convention decided that each elector should possess a real estate of the
value of 20 pounds, and each candidate for election one of the value Of
300 pounds; that every town having one-hundred families should be entitled
to one representative, and one more for every one-hundred families
additional; that towns having less than one-hundred families should be
classed. The number of inhabitants had been ascertained to be 82,200, of
which 11,089 belonged to Cheshire county. But at that time, Cheshire
county included the territory now called Sullivan county. It was decided
that the entire population should be represented by 89 representatives.
Having sent to the towns copies of the plan of representation
proposed, the Convention dissolved on the 16th day of November.
On
the 4th day of December, a town-meeting was held to choose a person to
represent Chesterfield and Hinsdale in the "Provincial
Congress," as it was called, to be held at Exeter on the 2ist day of
the same month. Archibald Robertson was chosen for this purpose. Mr.
Robertson was to hold his office for one year, and was the first delegate
or representative chosen by the town; at least, he was the first of whom
we have any record. Capt. Shattuck, Aaron Cooper, Capt. Hildreth, Ensign
Smith and Lieut. Fletcher were constituted a committee to give Mr.
Robertson his instructions. Aaron Cooper was of Hinsdale, as was,
probably, also Capt. Shattuck.
As
soon as the Convention, of which Mr. Robertson was a member, had
assembled, a new form of Government was drawn up. On the 5th day of
January, 1776, the Convention assumed the name and authority of a House of
Representatives, and chose twelve persons to form a separate branch of the
Legislature, with the name of Council. These were empowered to choose
their own president. It was decreed that no act should be valid without
the approval of both branches. The two branches also performed executive
duties, while in session; and at every adjournment, a "committee of
safety" was appointed to exercise executive powers during the
recesses of the Legislature. The president of the Council was also
president of this committee. The first person who held this position was
Meshech Weare. The name of "Colony of New Hampshire" was now
adopted, and retained till independence had been formally declared.
On
the first day of February, 1776, the inhabitants of Chesterfield held a
town-meeting at which Ephraim Baldwin was elected a justice of the peace,
to serve for the term of one year. The annual meeting for this year was
held on the 6th day of March. This meeting was called "in the name of
the Council or House of Representatives," all previous ones having
been called "in his Majesty's name." Ephraim Baldwin, Michael
Cressey, Samuel Hildreth, Moses Smith, Jr., and Ephraim Hubbard were
chosen selectmen. At another
meeting held the 19th day of April, it was voted not to raise money for
schooling; but a committee of seven men was formed to divide the town into
school-wards. At a town-meeting held the 31st day of May, it was
voted to accept the school-wards as laid out by the committee chosen for
that purpose, and to raise thirty pounds for school purposes. It was also
voted to allow each ward to employ its own instructors, and to exempt
those men who were in the army from paying a poll-tax for that year.
On
the 14th of March the General Congress passed the following resolution:
Resolved, That it be recommended to
the several Assemblies, Conventions and Councils, or Committees of Safety
of the United Colonies, immediately to cause all persons to be disarmed,
within their respective Colonies, who are notoriously disaffected to the
cause of AMERICA, Or who have not associated, and refuse to associate, to
defend by ARMS the United Colonies, against the hostile attempts of the
British fleets and armies."
This
resolution having been received by the Committee of Safety for the Colony,
it was transmitted to the selectmen of the towns throughout the whole
Colony, together with the following request:
“Colony
of New Hampshire
IN
Committee OF SAFETY
April
12, 1776.
In
order to carry the underwritten Resolve of the Honorable Continental
Congress into execution, you are requested to desire all males above
twenty-one years of age (lunatics, idiots and negroes excepted) to sign to
the DECLARATION on this paper; and when so done to make return thereof,
together with the name or names of all who shall refuse to sign the same,
to the General Assembly or Committee of Safety of this Colony.
M.
WEARE, Chairman."
The
Declaration.
WE,
THE, SUBSCRIBERS, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY ENGAGE AND PROMISE, THAT WE WILL, TO
THE UTMOST OF OUR POWER, AT THE RISQUE OF OUR LIVES AND FORTUNES, WITH
ARMS, OPPOSE THE HOSTILE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH FLEETS AND ARMIES
AGAINST THE UNITED AMERICAN COLONIES.
The
selectmen of Chesterfield having received the "Declaration,"
sent the following reply to the Committee of Safety. The date of their
letter is not given, but it must have been written before the 12th of
June:
"TO
THE HONORABLE COMMITTEE OF SAFETY OR GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE COLONY OF NEW
HAMPSHIRE. As soon as ever we received your Directions requesting us to
desire all the Males in this Town to sign to a Declaration (Lunaticks,
&c.
excepted) in obedience thereto we Immediately proceeded to give
publick Notice of your Intentions and otherwise as we Thought would have
the most effectual Tendency to have put into Execution, in order that we
might make a Return by our Representative, but having so short a Time for
to accomplish the Matter in so great a Town, and being unwilling to omit
anything relating to our Duty and which might be for the Benefit of the
Whole, we calmly deliberated on the matter, asked ye advice of our
Representative and others of Sense and Steadiness, and as we were not
limited to a certain Time to make a Return, we propose to make one as soon
as it may be done with conveniency.
So
rest your Humble Servts.,
EPHM.
BALDWM,
Selectmen
MICHAEL CRESEY,
of
SAMUEL HILDRETH
Chesterfield.
June
12, 1776, the selectmen made the following return: "In obedience to
the within Declaration that we rec’d from your Honors, we proceeded
According to your Directions and the persons Names underwriten are
those that Refuse to sign to the Declaration on your paper:
Capt.
Jonathan Hildreth, Eleazer
Pomeroy,
Ebenezer Harvey,
Lieut. Ephraim Whitney,
Ebenezer Cooper,
Joseph Prentice,
Ephraim Whitney,
Ebenezer Fletcher, Jr.,
Sam’l Davis Converse,
Elisha Walton,
Eseek Earl,
Silas Bennett,
Sal. Keing [Samuel King]
EPH.
BALDWIN,
Selectmen Of Chesterfield.
MOSES SMITH, JR.,
MICHAEL CRESEY,
EPH’M HUBBARD,
SAM’L HILDRETH
NAMES
OF THOSE WHO SIGNED THE DECLARATION.
Abraham
Wood,
Moses Smith,
Simon Davis,
Josiah Streeter,
Isaac Davis,
Michael Woodcock,
John Snow,
Jonathan Cobleigh,
Oliver Cobleigh,
Jonas Stearns,
Jonathan Farwell,
Samuel Fairbanks,
Oliver Farwell,
Jonathan Farr, 2d,
Silas Thompson,
Josiah
Lamb,
William Farwell,
Samuel Walker,
Jonathan Davis,
Archibald Robertson,
Warren Snow,
Andrew Colburn,
Ebenezer Streeter,
Lawrence Walton,
William Thomas,
Phineas Brown,
Daniel Baldwin,
John Sanderson,
William Simonds,
William Fisher,
Amos Smith,
Jonathan Hildreth, Jr.,
Josh Smith, [probably Joseph Smith.]James Wheeler, Jr.,
Jonathan Farr, 4th,
Josiah Hastings,
Jonathan Farr, 3d,
Andrew Hastings,
Thomas Farr,
Noah Emmons,
Benjamin Hudson,
Jonathan Cressey,
Ephraim Wheeler,
William Farr, Jr.,
John Cobleigh
Ithamar Chamberlain,
Joseph Higgins,
Caleb Johnson,.
James McElroy,
Amos Streeter,
Joseph Wheeler,
Abner Johnson,
James Wheeler, Kimball
Carlton,
Zenas Fairbanks,
Theodore Bingham,
Nathan Bishop,
John Pierce,
Isaac Hildreth,
Benjamin Colburn.
Israel Johnson,
Ephraim Farr,
James Robertson,
Isaac Farr,
Elisba Rockwood,
Thomas Darby,
Dan Cobleigh,
Joseph Metcalf,
Aaron Farr,
Martin Warner
Peter Wheeler,
David Stooder, Jr.,
Moses Ellis,
[David Stoddard, Jr.,]
Ephraim Hubbard,
Samuel Peacock,
Amos Davis,
John Peacock,
John White,
Ephraim Baldwin,
Nathan Metcalf, Michael
Cressey,
John Bishop,
Samuel Hildreth,
Jonathan Cobleigh,
Moses Smith. Jr.,
Nathan Thomas,
William Aires,
Abel Emmons,
David Stone,
William Robertson,
John Grandy,
Edward Hildreth,
John Grandy, Jr.
James Davis,
Increase Lamb
Enoch Streeter,
Abner Albee,
John Pratt,
Ebenezer Taft,
Nathaniel Bingham,
John Richardson,
Abel Ray,
Daniel Kinnison,
Samuel Farr,
Joel Whitney,
Nehemiah Merrill,
David Farr,
Samuel Farr, Jr.,
James Mansfield
John Haskell,
Amos Hubbard,
Ezekiel Powers,
Jonathan Farr, 1st,
Silas Wood,
Patrick McMichael,
Obahiah Merrill,
Abijah Kingsbury
William Henry,
Ebenezer
Gail,
Daniel Farr,
Sylvanus Battey,
Amasa Colburn,
Ebenezer Faver,
Thomas Harris,
Abijah Stearns,
Douglas Robbins,
Matthew Gray,
Ullainell Merrill,
William Hildreth,
Sherebiah Fay
James Reed,
Zur Evans,
John Ellis,
Oliver Hubbard,
Benjamin Smith,
Michael Metcalf,
Samuel Fletcher,
Charles Johnson
Abraham
Farr.
One
hundred and thirty-nine persons signed the Declaration, and thirteen
refused to sign. The Declaration was known as the "Association
Test," and, according to the returns that were made, was signed by
8,199 persons in the Colony of New Hampshire; while only 773 persons
refused to sign.
Had
the Americans failed in their cause, every person who signed it would have
been subjected to the "pains and penalties of treason." It was a
preliminary step to the national "Declaration of Independence,"
which was declared on the 4th day of July, the same year. Within fourteen
days after the announcement of the National Declaration, it was proclaimed
by the beating of drums in all the shire-towns of New Hampshire.
On
the 30th of July, another town-meeting was held, the record of which is as
follows: "The inhabitants of Chesterfield met at the meeting-house
and proceeded as follows: Voted to act on a circular letter dated at
Walpole, and chose Eph'm Baldwin as our agent to go to Walpole and act and
transact (?) on matters, if they see fit when met, for the benefit of the
county of Cheshire, and voted that the committee of safety give
instructions to said Baldwin."
On
the 2d day of December, another town-meeting was held. The warrant for
this meeting was the first that ever bore the words "State of New
Hampshire" at its head, and the meeting was called "in the name
of the government and people of said State." Soon after the
Declaration of Independence, the name "Colony" had been dropped,
and the name of "State" adopted in its stead. At this meeting
Michael Cressey was elected to represent the town in the Assemblv that was
to meet at Exeter the third Wednesday of the same month. Rev. Mr. Wood,
Dea. Thompson, Lieut. Fairbanks, Dr. Harvey and Lieut. Rockwood were
chosen a committee to give Mr. Cressey his instructions. In accordance
with the vote passed on the 2d day of December, the committee chosen for
that purpose gave Mr. Cressey the following instructions:
“To
Mr. MICHAEL CREASY. REPRESENTATIVE POR THE TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD
IN
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE”
Sir.--Whereas it having pleased
Almighty God to humble the people of this land, by permitting the tyrant
of Great Britain and his minions, in the fulness of their rage, to prevail
against them, by subverting the Civil Constitution of every Province in
his late American dominions, affecting thereby the activity of law and
justice and [promoting] the introduction of vice and profaneness, attended
with domestick confusion and all the calamities attendant on the
dissolution of the power of Civil Government, which in this alarming
progress have made it absolutely necessary for each state to separate
itself from that land from whence their forefathers were exiled by the
cruel hand of tyranny, and to form for itself, under the ruler of all the
earth, such plans of Civil Government as the people thereof should think
most conducive to their own safety and advantage; notwithstanding the
importance of an equitable system of Government, as it affects ourselves
and our posterity, we are brought to the disagreeable necessity of
declaring that it is our candid opinion that the State of New Hampshire,
instead of forming an equitable plan of Government, conducing to the peace
and safety of the State, Have been influenced by the iniquitous intrigues
and secret designations of persons unfriendly, to settle down upon the
dregs of Monarchical and Aristocratical Tyranny, in imitation of their
late British oppressor. We can by no means imagine ourselves so far lost
to a sense of the natural rights and immnnities of ourselves and our
fellow men, as to imagine that the State can be either safe or happy under
a constitution formed without the knowledge or particular authority of a
great part of its inhabitants; a constitution which no man knows the
contents of, except that the whole Legislative power of the State is to be
entirelv vested in the will and pleasure of a House of Representatives,
and that chosen according to the Sovereign determination of their own
will, by allowing to some towns sundry voices in the said House, others
but one, and others none; and in a Council of twelve men, five of which
are always to be residents of Rockingham County, who by the assistance of
two others of said Council, have the power of a casting voice in all State
affairs. Thus we see the important affairs of the State liable to be
converted to the advantage of a small part of the State, and the emolument
of its officers, by reason of the other part of the State not having an
equal or equitable share in the Government to counterbalance the designs
of the other. You are therefore authorized and instructed to exert
yourself to the utmost to procure a redress of the aforementioned
grievances, and in case they will not comply, to return home for further
instructions.
SOLOMAN HARVEY, Chesterfield, December
ye 12th, 1776.
per order Com."
The
inhabitants of Chesterfield were not alone in complaining of the
injustice, as they regarded it, of the principle of representation that
had been adopted. A number of towns in the western part of the State
remonstrated against the form of government that had been assumed, and
some of them refused to send representatives to the Assembly.
It was asserted that every incorporated town, whether large or
small, should be entitled to at least one representative; and some towns
maintained that there ought to be no Council to negative the proceedings
of the House.
An
incident occurred in the town on the 27th of January, 1777, that is worthy
of mention. Our knowledge of this incident is derived wholly from a
petition sent to the General Assembly by Richard Coughlan. In this
petition Coughlan stated that, on the day above-mentioned, Kimball Carlton
and "divers others" broke into his house and destroyed about
twenty gallons of rum, abused him and his wife, and took him prisoner. His
captors afterwards got a warrant from Ephm. Baldwin, appointing the 11th
dav of February for his trial. Coughlan appeared for trial, but no one
appeared to testify against him. He also complained that the men
"swore in a prophane manner." The object of his petition was to
get indemnity for the rum that had been destroyed.
The
annual town-meeting for 1777 was on the 5th day of March.
Lieut. Fairbanks, Lieut. Rockwood, and Lieut. Robertson were chosen
selectmen. Lieut.
Fairbanks, Jonathan Farr, 2d, Lieut. Robertson, Warren Snow and Lieut.
Rockwood were chosen a "committee of inspection and
correspondence." In the warrant for this meeting had been inserted
the following article: "To see if the town will write anything to
ease any reflections cast on the Hon'ble Committee from the General Court,
by a letter sent to said Committee from this town." The vote on this
article was in the negative. The writer has been unable to find the letter
referred to, or to learn the name of its author. It was also voted, at the
same meeting, to raise 5o pounds for schooling.
May
29, another meeting was held, having been called in pursuance of "an
act passed in this State relative to choosing committees in the several
towns in the State, in order to regulate the prices of provisions and
other articles mentioned in said act." Ensign Moses Smith, Martin
Warner, Capt. Hildreth, Lieut. Farwell and John Sargent were chosen a
committee to carry out the provisions of the above-mentioned act. This
act.was passed by the General Court, in January, for reasons set forth in
the preamble to the same, which is as follows:
Whereas
the exorbitant Price of the of the Necessary and convenient Articles of
Life, and also of Labour, within this state, at this time of Distress,
(unless speedily and effectually remedied) will be attended with the most
fatal and pernicious Consequences.”
A
few extracts from this act are here given, to show more fully its nature.
The price of good, merchantable wheat was not to exceed 7s. 6d. per bushl;
rye, 4s. 6d. per bushel; Indian corn, 3s. 6d. per bushel; beans, 6s. per
bushel; potatoes, at any season of the vear, 2s; butter of the best
quality, 10d. per lb - salted pork, by the barrel of 220 lbs. weight, £5;
good sole-leather 1s. 6d. per lb. N. E. rum, of the best quality, 3s. 10d.
per gal., by the hogshead, and 4s. 6d. by the single gallon; best
Muscovado sugars, 8d. by the single pound, at the first port of delivery,
allowing 9d. per cwt. for every ten miles of land-carriage, good coffee;
4d per single lb.; good sheep's wool, 2s 2d. per lb.; good cotton cloth,
one yard wide, 3s. 8d. per.yard; good N. E. bar-iron, 40s. per cwt., at
the iron-works. The
price of farm labor, in the summer season, was not to exceed 3s. 4d. per
day, and was to be in proportion at other seasons. Other kinds of labor
were to be computed according to previous custonm and usage, compared
with farm labor. Certain penalties were also provided for the
violation of any of the provisions of the act.
This law proved very ineffectual, however, and was repealed.
Another
town-meeting was called for June 12th. The warrant was preceded by an
"introductory address" to the inhabitants of the town, by Samuel
Fairbanks and Elisha Rockwood. This address was as follows.
"TO
THE INHABITANTS OF CHESTERFIELD.
Gentlemen:
You are not ignorant of the calamities of this present day. Enemies
without the state, and within; and being of late often alarmed by hearing
of many conspiricies of such persons as were generally esteemed friendly
to the American Cause and Freedom; and also of the great oppression of
some and rejoicings of others at the fall and under Vallument of the paper
currency, and some rejecting the Regulating Acts; all the above said
circumstances considered, with many others that might be offered, it
appears necessary that every town should be furnished with full sets of
officers, both selectmen and committees of correspondence; and, as one
constable is gone, or going, out of town, there will be need of one in his
room and stead,--we have thought fit by the advice of some and desire of
others, to call the town together for the purposes hereafter mentioned.
The
fourth article of the warrant that followed the address was, "To see
if the town inhabitants will choose a committee of correspondence to unite
with other towns in this day of distress, and use means to defend all our
lawful rights." At the meeting which followed, Nathaniel Bingham and
Jonathan Farr, 2d, were elected additional selectmen; and it was voted to
confirm the election of the committee chosen May 29th, with the exception
of John Sargent, whose election was annulled.
The constable referred to in the above address was John Pierce. The
record merely says, "Voted in the negative with regard to the
constable."
August
28, there was another town-meeting. There was considerable trouble with
respect to the working out of highway taxes, this year; for much of the
money that had been raised for the repair of the roads, had not been
worked out as was directed. Some
declared they would, not work at all, unless the delinquents were
compelled to make up their deficiencies, and "a real regulation took
place." It was, therefore, voted that every man should work out his
part of the "highway rate," or pay an equivalent; and if he
refused to do so, he was to be "proceeded against' as the law
directed.
On
the 8th day of December, the fifth town-meeting of the year was held. At
this meeting it was voted to sell the pews not already sold, at public
vendue, and to put the pew money that had not been paid, on interest.
From
the journal of the House for Saturday, Dec. 20th, is extracted the
following: "Voted, That Mr. Giles, Mr. Cresey, Mr. Mellin be a
Committee, with such as the Hon'ble Board shall appoint, to consider of
the address of the Committee of Safety of Chesterfield, and report
thereon." The following extract from this address, contains nearly
all the information concerning the conduct of the principal tories of the
town, which the writer has been able to obtain:
To
the Honourable Court of State of New Hampshire:
The
Committee of Safety of Chesterfield humbly sheweth this Honbl
House, that whereas sundry Persons, viz., Ebenezer Harvey, Elezor Pomroy
and Sam'l King, all of Chesterfield abovsd, Were Some time in
June last summoned to appear before the Court of Enquiry at Keen, as being
Enemical to the United States of America, and upon tryall were found
guilty of a misdemeanor against the State: on which account they were
fined and confined to their farms by Bond, till that or some other Court
or authority should set them at Liberty --upon which they, or some of
them, Beg'd the Favour of Sd Court, that they might have ye
Liberty of taking the Oath of Fidelity to the States; on which accompt Esqr
Giles went Immediately to Exeter, as we have been informed, and procured
said oath or form of it, and sent to us by Sheriff Cook of Keen, and our
Direction was to take a justice of the Peace and tender 'sd
oath to those confined persons, to ye end they might take it
and performe accordingly and be at Liberty; and we followed the Directions
of Esqr Prentice and Esqr Wyman. The aforementioned
confined persons said they were willing to take ye said oath,
if it came from lawful authority; but they Disputed ye
authority and paid no regard to Esqr Prentice Letter, which was
to take the Oath of fidelity and be set at Liberty; and as they were fully
fixed in principal or will, they apply'd to Justice Baldwin and he
liberated them. Again they
apply'd to Esqr Wyman and notwithstanding they neglected to
take the oath, he, said Justice, enlarged their bonds just so far as to
serve their own turns fall which was contrary to ye advice of
the Committee, except they would take ye oath of Fidelity to
the States, and their bonds are just so far enlarged as to serve their own
turns; and when called upon to do any publick service, they say that they
are confined, and so are excused: all which gives great uneasiness to many
steady friends to America.
* * *
We
do therefore pray your Honours to take these things into your wise
consideration, and Dismiss or Confine the abovementioned persons, and that
they be subjects of their duty and service in ye defence of our
much oppress’d land.
SAMUEL
FAIRBANK,
ELISHA ROCKWOOD
JAMES ROBERTSON, Committee
of safety, Chesterfield, December ye 13th, 1777.
To
the Honble Court or Committee of Safety of this New Hampshire
State.
(a Copy near similar to the former petition.)
Test., Saml Fairbank, Chairman."
Esqr.
Giles and Esqr. Prentice, referred to in this petition, were probably
Benjamin Giles of Newport, a prominent member of the House of
Representatives, and Nathaniel Sartel Prentice of Alstead. Esqr. Wyman was
undoubtedly Col. Isaac Wyman of Keene. It is not known what action the
General Court took with regard to the persons against whom complaint was
made in the above petition; but it appears, from a vote passed by the
House, March 2d, 1778, that Esqr. Baldwin, who was town-clerk at that
time, was summoned to appear before that body, to answer to a complaint
made against him by the town committee of safety. The following is the
record of the vote passed by the House: Voted, That Ephraim Baldwin,
Esqr.. of Chesterfield, be cited to appear before the General Assembly on
the second Friday of their next session, to answer to a complaint
exhibited to this Court, against him, by the Committee of Chesterfield, as
speaking or acting in some measure Enemical to the Liberties of the
American States."
The
upper branch of the General Assembly concurred with the House in this
vote. On the 14th of March the House adjourned, to meet again on the 20th
of May. After a session of three days, there being no quorum of the
Council, the House again adjourned to the 12th day of August. No record of
any further action, on the part of the General Assemblv, respecting the
complaint made against Mr. Baldwin, has been found.
The
first town-meeting, of the year 1778, was held February 6th.
The warrant contained the following article. "To read and
consult the articles of confederation, as directed by the Court of this
State, agreeable to the resolve of the Continental Congress." It was
voted "to approve and accept of the confederation of the United
States"; also, "to comply with the directions of the General
Court of this State, relating to the instructing our representative
concerning a plan or system for the future government of this State."
The
"articles of confederation" mentioned in the warrant, were the
ones adopted by the Continental Congress, Nov. 15th, 1777.
Thirteen states took part in the "confederation," which
was to be thenceforth styled "The United States of America."
At
the annual town-meeting held March 4th, Samuel Hildreth, Lieut. Moses
Smith, Abner Johnson, Capt. Kimball Carlton and Capt. Jacob Hinds were
elected selectmen. It was also voted that each inhabitant of the town
should pay his proportion of the expenses of the war.
On
the 26th of February, a resolution was passed by the House, instructing
the President of the Council to issue a precept to every town, parish and
district in the State, recommending them to elect one or more persons to
attend a convention at Concord, on the 10th dav of June following, in
order to agree upon some system or form of government for the State. At a
town-meeting held in accordance with the above-mentioned precept, on the
21st of April, it was voted not to send a delegate to the convention;
also, "not to raise money to hire continental men." There is no
record of another town-meeting, this year, till the ...
(Continued)…
|